The book of the Revelation of St John is a rather bizarre and incomprehensible book. It is clear that in some respects it is a picture of the relationship of God and the Church. It is also clear that it is predictive of future events.
The issue is that it doesn't describe these future events plainly. Rather it uses a style of writing referred to as "apocalyptic". It is full of metaphor and word pictures. Combine the style of writing with the natural understanding difficulties caused by language and culture differences between then and now, and it is rather difficult to speculate about the exact way events will occur. That has not stopped people from trying. Many Christians seem to be obsessed with unearthing the secrets of the way things will occur.
Here is something to think about. History has already shown us this scenario. The Old Testament is full of references to the future Christ. One of the clearest is in Isaiah 52-53, but it is only clear in hindsight. Instead of talking about "Jesus" it talks about "The Suffering Servant". Other scriptures talk of a coming King.
By the time Jesus arrived, everyone was speculating about what was to come. Religious people had spent their lives wrestling with the predictive scriptures and had huge political investment in the idea that a king was coming, and SOON! They had very specific ideas of how it was all going to come to pass. But when Jesus came they didn't recognise him.
By contrast there was a man named Simeon who had a beautiful connection with God. He was so close to the Holy Spirit that when Jesus was just a child, Simeon recognised him in a crowded place and correctly declared Him to be the Salvation of God. Here was a man that wasn't in a library working out timelines based on scripture; but was out in the world conversing with God every day and ready and attentive to what the Holy Spirit would show him about the PRESENT.
What I'm trying to say is this. Don't be ignorant of the scripture, but don't spend all your time focusing on the distant future, to the neglect of what the Spirit would show you about the present. The most important thing is developing a personal connection with God; and learning to converse with Him. If you have that, you can trust Him that whatever comes, He will be with you.
Some people seem to think that if you aren't prepared for the "endtime", then you will probably die; unlike those wise people that have emergency food rations and hidden bunkers in the wilderness ready for the rise of the "beast". To that I retort, Matthew 6:25-34. "Do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own."
Trust God.
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Friday, November 12, 2010
Dear Blog
I miss you. Writing my thoughts is fun, but I have no time to spare lately. Those playing Chess or Scrabble with me online know that I let it sit for over a week before I take my turn.
I will return to you after Schoolies is finished. I will have more time to spare then. Especially between Christmas and New Years.
I want to tell you about my brief trial of Mafia Wars and how they have created a culture of addiction in order to make maximum profits, and how a religious cult could use the same techniques. I want to tell you my views on whether Christians should be rich (A.K.A. Prosperity). I want to tell you about how cool Jamie Oliver is.
But here is something quick. The question I am pondering is this. Should I buy a Camera, or a Car? A Camera would open so many possibilities for me, and would result in a LOT more work. I have an ABN now, so I think I could write it off on tax, as long as I upload my photos for sale. But I really need a car. This one is giving me some major grief. Just spent 1.5G on it and still not working properly.
Oh well. I'm not worried about it. I'm being looked after well. ;)
Probably best to leave these decisions til after Schoolies.
I will return to you after Schoolies is finished. I will have more time to spare then. Especially between Christmas and New Years.
I want to tell you about my brief trial of Mafia Wars and how they have created a culture of addiction in order to make maximum profits, and how a religious cult could use the same techniques. I want to tell you my views on whether Christians should be rich (A.K.A. Prosperity). I want to tell you about how cool Jamie Oliver is.
But here is something quick. The question I am pondering is this. Should I buy a Camera, or a Car? A Camera would open so many possibilities for me, and would result in a LOT more work. I have an ABN now, so I think I could write it off on tax, as long as I upload my photos for sale. But I really need a car. This one is giving me some major grief. Just spent 1.5G on it and still not working properly.
Oh well. I'm not worried about it. I'm being looked after well. ;)
Probably best to leave these decisions til after Schoolies.
Saturday, August 21, 2010
How I Voted. And Why.
If anything, expect this post to reveal my complete ignorance on the Australian Political System. It was only when I got to the polling place that I remembered that there are two bits of paper. A green one and a white one.
Firstly, a note on Christianity and Politics. Separation between church and state was originally advocated by Christians in order to stop the state from controlling things that should be decided by religion. I don't think it is necessary to have Christian politicians. But I also support the right for churches to say that Islam or Homosexuality is wrong, as long as they are not inciting hatred. Those matters are religious, and should not be dictated to by the state.
Let me address a few of the core policy issues.
1) Indigenous Affairs.
I think this is the most pressing need in our country, and the most ignored. Anyone who has not visited a community would not understand. It is like entering another country. Major parties don't give a damn, because these things do not affect the voting majority. I am passionate about the fact that real change will require, not more money, but politicians who care enough to spend time, consult experienced people, and be innovative.
My choice on this issue is clear. Yodie Batzke, an Independent. She knows the issues that face our local region, and cares about them passionately. She is also a friend of mine ;)
2) Economics.
I don't believe that going into debt is a responsible choice, regardless of the benefits. It would not be wise for me to get a credit card and give all the money to someone in need, leaving myself in debt. I am all for Social Justice, but we can only give what we have. Currently our debt is climbing at an astronomical rate. The only party that has clearly shown the ability to maintain a surplus is the LNP. I understand that labour has given more in aid, however it was not theirs to give. Frankly I feel that ignoring "matters of money" to pursue "matters of conscience" is naive. On this issue, my choice is clear. LNP.
3) Freedom of Religion
I recently found out that the big stink about greens wanting to force churches to hire non-christians, would not apply to ministers or pastors, as obviously a non-christian would not have the "abilities" required for the job. This would really only apply to other staff, e.g. gardeners, etc. I'm quite certain that our church wouldn't discriminate against non-christians for staff roles of this sort anyway, so to me this is a non-issue.
4) Christian Politicians
While I love the fact that the Lord's Prayer is said in parliament, I don't think the issue is big enough to warrant changing my vote. I also don't feel that an atheist Prime Minister would necessarily be a bad thing. I am in favour of the separation of church and state, so long as that term is not used to limit Christian freedoms, and this does not. I will not vote for or against someone based on their personal religious persuasion. My decision: non-issue.
5) Overseas Aid
Taken into balance with my views above on the economy, I do feel that the LNP is rather stingy with overseas aid. I am sure that the LNP will remove debt at all costs, but perhaps, once they are in surplus, a few Greens in the house of reps will force them to increase aid expenditure. I admire greens for their commitment to helping the human race. Social Justice is incredibly important, and plays a large part in my decision making. So, in this area I favour Greens.
6) Life Vs Choice
The critical issue in the life vs choice debate is whether a foetus is a living child or simply a bunch of cells. All other arguments are useless in the face of this one. (Obviously no-one is debating whether a mother should be able to CHOOSE to kill her 3-year old child). As a part of my faith, and Christian worldview, I believe that a human becomes a human, not at birth, not at conception, but prior to conception. The Bible says that God has known us, and has a plan for our lives, since the creation of the World. It also says that he knits us together in our mother's wombs. Every human is a creative work of God that should be protected. This worldview puts me squarely into the "pro-life" side of the fence. I feel that the ONLY case where abortion is acceptable is if the life of the mother is at stake. For a doctor, sworn to the Hippocratic Oath, it is simply a matter of logic. Loose both lives, or save one by killing one.
With all that said, I am disgusted at Christians who act judgementally toward mothers who have abortions. These women need support, not punishment. In the end, I feel that my strong views on this subject are a non-issue for this election, as from what I have seen none of the major parties are suggesting changes to the current abortion or euthanasia laws.
7) Same-Sex Marriages
This is one area where the separation of church and state is important. To me, the holy union in the sight of God between a man and a woman, committed solely to each other for life, is a spiritual thing. The legal institution of marriage is completely different. The secular idea marriage is constantly invoked in today's world between two people who have no intention of staying together. They readily divorce and marry again. If a same-sex couple want to engage in this behaviour, I see no reason why that should be illegal. In fact, I would support the state from changing the name of what they recognise to something else, so the church could retain the name marriage for what it was originally intended for. If we want to get technical, I believe that a man and woman, who have had a wedding and are legally married, could be not married in the sight of God and would be therefore committing fornication. Why? Because true marriage is spiritual, not legal. I am also, frankly, appalled at the way Christians have treated this debate. A vocal minority have presented a view of Christianity as judgemental and aloof. This is one area where I am at odds with all Christian parties and the ACL. In relation to this election, I consider this to be a non-issue.
8) School Chaplaincy
I'm running out of motivation to write so I will be brief. I strongly support school chaplaincy, as I have seen first-hand the incredible work that it is doing. I am even considering being a chaplain at some point. The party with the firmest promise of ongoing support for the NSCP is the LNP.
9) Wise Counsel
I asked many friends what they thought of the election, and found that most older, wiser friends, who I tend to trust, favoured LNP. Friends who favoured ALP were younger, with less experience.
10) Censorship
I am strongly opposed to government-controlled censorship of the Internet, which I could discuss in detail elsewhere. This is another reason that I am opposed to all Christian parties and the ACL and I'm appalled at their FUD campaigns. Both LNP and Greens have stated that they will not implement mandatory filtering at the ISP level, but will instead put measures in place to allow parents to filter their personal internet connection, with things like rebates on filtering software. This is of course, the responsible way to protect children from viewing unsuitable content.
Based on all these points, I voted:
1: Yodie Batzke (Independent)
2: Warren Entsch (Liberal National Party of Queensland)
3: Neville St. John-Wood (The Greens)
I hope I did the right thing!
P.S.
7: Jim Turnour (Australian Labor Party)
P.P.S.
Has anyone noticed that Jim Turnour and Tony Abbott look very similar?
Firstly, a note on Christianity and Politics. Separation between church and state was originally advocated by Christians in order to stop the state from controlling things that should be decided by religion. I don't think it is necessary to have Christian politicians. But I also support the right for churches to say that Islam or Homosexuality is wrong, as long as they are not inciting hatred. Those matters are religious, and should not be dictated to by the state.
Let me address a few of the core policy issues.
1) Indigenous Affairs.
I think this is the most pressing need in our country, and the most ignored. Anyone who has not visited a community would not understand. It is like entering another country. Major parties don't give a damn, because these things do not affect the voting majority. I am passionate about the fact that real change will require, not more money, but politicians who care enough to spend time, consult experienced people, and be innovative.
My choice on this issue is clear. Yodie Batzke, an Independent. She knows the issues that face our local region, and cares about them passionately. She is also a friend of mine ;)
2) Economics.
I don't believe that going into debt is a responsible choice, regardless of the benefits. It would not be wise for me to get a credit card and give all the money to someone in need, leaving myself in debt. I am all for Social Justice, but we can only give what we have. Currently our debt is climbing at an astronomical rate. The only party that has clearly shown the ability to maintain a surplus is the LNP. I understand that labour has given more in aid, however it was not theirs to give. Frankly I feel that ignoring "matters of money" to pursue "matters of conscience" is naive. On this issue, my choice is clear. LNP.
3) Freedom of Religion
I recently found out that the big stink about greens wanting to force churches to hire non-christians, would not apply to ministers or pastors, as obviously a non-christian would not have the "abilities" required for the job. This would really only apply to other staff, e.g. gardeners, etc. I'm quite certain that our church wouldn't discriminate against non-christians for staff roles of this sort anyway, so to me this is a non-issue.
4) Christian Politicians
While I love the fact that the Lord's Prayer is said in parliament, I don't think the issue is big enough to warrant changing my vote. I also don't feel that an atheist Prime Minister would necessarily be a bad thing. I am in favour of the separation of church and state, so long as that term is not used to limit Christian freedoms, and this does not. I will not vote for or against someone based on their personal religious persuasion. My decision: non-issue.
5) Overseas Aid
Taken into balance with my views above on the economy, I do feel that the LNP is rather stingy with overseas aid. I am sure that the LNP will remove debt at all costs, but perhaps, once they are in surplus, a few Greens in the house of reps will force them to increase aid expenditure. I admire greens for their commitment to helping the human race. Social Justice is incredibly important, and plays a large part in my decision making. So, in this area I favour Greens.
6) Life Vs Choice
The critical issue in the life vs choice debate is whether a foetus is a living child or simply a bunch of cells. All other arguments are useless in the face of this one. (Obviously no-one is debating whether a mother should be able to CHOOSE to kill her 3-year old child). As a part of my faith, and Christian worldview, I believe that a human becomes a human, not at birth, not at conception, but prior to conception. The Bible says that God has known us, and has a plan for our lives, since the creation of the World. It also says that he knits us together in our mother's wombs. Every human is a creative work of God that should be protected. This worldview puts me squarely into the "pro-life" side of the fence. I feel that the ONLY case where abortion is acceptable is if the life of the mother is at stake. For a doctor, sworn to the Hippocratic Oath, it is simply a matter of logic. Loose both lives, or save one by killing one.
With all that said, I am disgusted at Christians who act judgementally toward mothers who have abortions. These women need support, not punishment. In the end, I feel that my strong views on this subject are a non-issue for this election, as from what I have seen none of the major parties are suggesting changes to the current abortion or euthanasia laws.
7) Same-Sex Marriages
This is one area where the separation of church and state is important. To me, the holy union in the sight of God between a man and a woman, committed solely to each other for life, is a spiritual thing. The legal institution of marriage is completely different. The secular idea marriage is constantly invoked in today's world between two people who have no intention of staying together. They readily divorce and marry again. If a same-sex couple want to engage in this behaviour, I see no reason why that should be illegal. In fact, I would support the state from changing the name of what they recognise to something else, so the church could retain the name marriage for what it was originally intended for. If we want to get technical, I believe that a man and woman, who have had a wedding and are legally married, could be not married in the sight of God and would be therefore committing fornication. Why? Because true marriage is spiritual, not legal. I am also, frankly, appalled at the way Christians have treated this debate. A vocal minority have presented a view of Christianity as judgemental and aloof. This is one area where I am at odds with all Christian parties and the ACL. In relation to this election, I consider this to be a non-issue.
8) School Chaplaincy
I'm running out of motivation to write so I will be brief. I strongly support school chaplaincy, as I have seen first-hand the incredible work that it is doing. I am even considering being a chaplain at some point. The party with the firmest promise of ongoing support for the NSCP is the LNP.
9) Wise Counsel
I asked many friends what they thought of the election, and found that most older, wiser friends, who I tend to trust, favoured LNP. Friends who favoured ALP were younger, with less experience.
10) Censorship
I am strongly opposed to government-controlled censorship of the Internet, which I could discuss in detail elsewhere. This is another reason that I am opposed to all Christian parties and the ACL and I'm appalled at their FUD campaigns. Both LNP and Greens have stated that they will not implement mandatory filtering at the ISP level, but will instead put measures in place to allow parents to filter their personal internet connection, with things like rebates on filtering software. This is of course, the responsible way to protect children from viewing unsuitable content.
Based on all these points, I voted:
1: Yodie Batzke (Independent)
2: Warren Entsch (Liberal National Party of Queensland)
3: Neville St. John-Wood (The Greens)
I hope I did the right thing!
P.S.
7: Jim Turnour (Australian Labor Party)
P.P.S.
Has anyone noticed that Jim Turnour and Tony Abbott look very similar?
Monday, August 16, 2010
New.
My cry is to you oh my God! I, more than any other, need your renewing power. Because I am the chief of sinners. And you are the one who makes all things new!
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Of Grace
Reading a book on the history of theology and I noticed a recurring pattern, and thought I'd write a poem about it. I guess its some sort of cross between a Tanka and a Haiku. (I'm no poet)
Our pride screams merit
While those who know God's true heart
Filled with love for us
Fight tooth and nail to reclaim
The doctrine of Grace
Our pride screams merit
While those who know God's true heart
Filled with love for us
Fight tooth and nail to reclaim
The doctrine of Grace
Monday, August 2, 2010
Scholasticism at it's best.
The appeal to reason, the logical marshaling of arguments, the relentless exploration of the implications of ideas, and the fundamental conviction that, at its heart, the Christian gospel is rational, and can be shown to be rational.
- Alister E. McGrath: Christian Theology, an Introduction
- Alister E. McGrath: Christian Theology, an Introduction
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Psycho.
A scary lady from church started chatting to me the other day. Telling me that she had special revelations from God, and had been filled with the Holy Spirit since she was in the womb. That she didn't need any bible college or training because the Holy Spirit taught her everything she needs to know. Said she felt a "spiritual connection" to me, but most pastors and leaders would think she was crazy because of her "revelations" about heaven and the spirit world.
I smiled and nodded and inside I was dying a little. I want to hang a sign around her neck saying "most Christians aren't like this".
I smiled and nodded and inside I was dying a little. I want to hang a sign around her neck saying "most Christians aren't like this".
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Moses
A little theory I just thought of this morning while reading Exodus. Not 100% sure that this is correct interpretation of these scriptures, but here goes:
Twice God tests Moses with an opportunity. Step away from this corrupt and rebellious "people of God". God will destroy them, and start again with Moses. God's presence will be with Moses, and God will make a great nation from Moses's descendants.
Twice Moses refuses God's offer. Why? Because He understands God's heart.
How many people in our world think they are a "Moses". They look down on the "corrupt" and "rebellious" church system, and think God will make a new start with them as leader. How many cults are born with this "special relationship" between God and one man.
Let Moses be our example. Walk in humility and LOVE the people of God, with all their flaws. Moses says "kill me rather than remove your presence from your people".
Now leave me alone so that my anger may burn against them and that I may destroy them. Then I will make you into a great nation."
But Moses sought the favor of the LORD his God. "O LORD," he said, "why should your anger burn against your people, whom you brought out of Egypt with great power and a mighty hand?
Ex 32:10-11 NIV
The LORD replied, "My Presence will go with you, and I will give you rest."
Then Moses said to him, "If your Presence does not go with us, do not send us up from here.
Ex 33:14-15 NIV
Twice God tests Moses with an opportunity. Step away from this corrupt and rebellious "people of God". God will destroy them, and start again with Moses. God's presence will be with Moses, and God will make a great nation from Moses's descendants.
Twice Moses refuses God's offer. Why? Because He understands God's heart.
How many people in our world think they are a "Moses". They look down on the "corrupt" and "rebellious" church system, and think God will make a new start with them as leader. How many cults are born with this "special relationship" between God and one man.
Let Moses be our example. Walk in humility and LOVE the people of God, with all their flaws. Moses says "kill me rather than remove your presence from your people".
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Thoughts on Parenting
As a young single man, it may seem pretentious for me to have an opinion on parenting, but in fact I believe it would be irresponsible for me not to.
I believe that every person's life choices will have enormous effects on their children (current or future), and their children's children. The more I look at terrible situations in our world, the more obvious it becomes that generational curses are all around us. I recently began to read The Children of God by Deborah Davis. It is the very insightful story of the origins of the cult into which I was born. I was struck by the story of the founder's parents. Seemingly harmless deception was magnified in each generation, culminating in the founder's son committing violent murder-suicide (as well of countless lives destroyed by the power of cult).
When I began to attend church (and get my life on track) I quickly began to notice healthy family units, and wondered what it was that set them apart. Not simply God or the church, as some 'good Christian parents' had 'rebellious' and 'wayward' children, and others had raised champions for God. I loved seeing parents in the church, with all of their kids in ministry. Such vibrant, healthy and nurturing relationships between parents and children.
While my views are necessarily tailored by my own experience, this learning journey has not had anything to do with my relationship with my parents or siblings. It is purely for the benefit of my future wife, children, and grandchildren. I am determined to leave a generational blessing in my wake. A great spiritual platform for my descendants to stand on.
To that end, let me share with you some of the principles and methods which I hope to employ. I must, however, stress that these points are simply a mark of perfection that I am striving for at the beginning of my journey. They are NOT intended to insult anyone who has followed a different path. I know that life gets messy. In spite of my cynicism, I obstinately chase perfection.
Prior to birth
Kill your demons. If you don't, they will kill your children. My terminology is graphic for a purpose. This is the number one, most crucial point in the whole process. While you are still repressing all the crap you dealt with in your younger life, you are not fit to be a parent. I can strongly recommend Christian counselling for every person. Contact your local church, or if you live in Cairns / Townsville I can recommend some fantastic (and discreet) counsellors. The process is the most difficult you will ever go through, but also the most rewarding. You must be ruthless, in retrieving each memory, mindset, pain, and executing each one. This is critical for not only parenthood, but every deep relationship you will ever have.
Be Intentional. A stable family unit is one of the greatest gifts you can give your child. Before you have children, find a life partner and commit to them (marriage). Until then, for goodness sake, keep your pants ON. Take your time finding that person. Don't settle for anyone less than perfect. You are allowed to be picky. "Unwanted" children don't need to be told that they were an accident. They know.
Choose a Name. It is a travesty to invent a word that sounds nice, and use that as your child's identity. The meaning of a name is far more important that how it sounds, how often it is being used in your country at the time, etc. Take some time to consult good name dictionaries, including etymology, and before you make your final decision, be sure to check for other meanings in different languages. A name carries implicated identity.
Love Languages. This is not just for your marriage, it also applies to your children. Each person identifies most strongly with one of these 5 "love languages": Touch, Words of Appreciation, Quality Time, Gifts, and Acts of Service. When your child is very young, be intentional about using all 5 languages to show them your love. As they grow older, be attentive to determine which one they most desire, and give to that. It is selfish to only give out of your love language. There is no point showering them with gifts, when all they want is quality time. Or telling them how great they are, when they just wish you would give them a hug.
Discipline. One simple, yet profound statement, should rule you. "Never discipline in anger." Forgiveness does not necessitate removal of consequence or restoration of trust, but forgiveness is essential and must be immediate. If you feel injured or upset, DO NOT SPEAK TO YOUR CHILD. Remove yourself immediately until you have dissolved all anger, and found forgiveness. Then return to carry out the correct consequence. Discipline is solely for the purpose of providing guidance. Not to appease your emotions. Under these guidelines, I believe physical punishment is acceptable. If you decide not to use physical punishment, then DO NOT threaten to use it. Be very careful with threats as EVERY promise of punishment must be fulfilled in order to retain respect and trust.
Mutual Respect and Trust underpins every deep relationship, and your parenting is no exception. If you take your two year-old to a dinner party and he makes so much noise that you feel embarrassed, you are not at liberty to discipline him. Just because you are inconvenienced by his actions, does not mean he is being naughty, he is simply being two. By considering his needs as equal in importance to your own, you build mutual respect. This foundation will be shiningly clear (or glaringly missing) when your child becomes a teenager. Closely related to Respect is Trust. You MUST become a man of your word. There is no such thing as a promise, your yes should mean yes and your no should mean no. Every simple thing you say is a contract and should only be broken when necessary with contrition and tact.
Exemplify Righteousness. This is possibly the hardest point of all, and the one that will be failed the most. Right-living is essential during parenthood. Even in the little things. Your child may not realise that you are cheating on your tax return, burning music and movies, or regularly breaking the speed limit, but subconsciously they will pickup on your deceptive ways and you will see it magnified in their lives.
Teach Learning. Schooling is a funny thing. Your child's grades are completely irrelevant. It is, however, essential that your child develops a love for learning. Teach them how to learn, and how to fall in love with a topic. Also teach them to take responsibility for their own learning. There is a big difference between learning and being taught. There are no boring subjects (except OHS) so if your child consistently reports that a certain subject is boring, then you can be sure they have a boring teacher (who either does not love the subject or does not love the kids). You will need to be creative and put some time and effort into helping them learn to love that subject again. If all else fails, consider a different teacher/school. Remember that each formative year is critical. If one stupid teacher wrecks english (or maths, history, etc.) for your child in primary school, they will struggle in that area for the rest of their lives.
Lead Them. Don't just read parenting books, read leadership books. The links between parenting and leadership is worthy of a book on it's own (perhaps I will write it one day). I recommend any books by John Maxwell. Everything that an employee is looking for in a leader, is also what a child wants to see in a parent. The key concepts of mutual respect and trust come into play here. Don't just raise your children, lead them. If you can get this concept, your children will obey and follow you because you inspire them, not just because they are dependant on you.
Analyse your Reaction. Popular Culture is changing quickly. Remember that you shocked your (old, fuddy-duddy) parents with your actions, so don't be surprised when your teenager does something shocking with their appearance, tastes, interests, etc. Before you react, analyse your reaction. How important is it? Consider swallowing your shock and displaying acceptance and tolerance for the sake of your relationship. Begin to prepare yourself now in the knowledge that the world of youth fads will be a shocking place once you are old.
Schedules and Priorities. A person with family, home, and regular job will naturally develop a schedule that suits them. 3 regular meals a day, standard bedtime, wake up early, etc. When your child is a young adult their priorities will be very different to yours. It would be highly counter-productive for them to adopt your schedule, so don't force it on them. They might have their most productive time from 6pm - 11pm, and regularly go to bed after midnight, but that is why Young Adults can get so much done. Appreciate it.
I'm sure there is more I can't think of right now that is probably very important to me. Perhaps I will update this post with more info. But now, I am tired and have work to do before bed. Goodnight.
Be Intentional. A stable family unit is one of the greatest gifts you can give your child. Before you have children, find a life partner and commit to them (marriage). Until then, for goodness sake, keep your pants ON. Take your time finding that person. Don't settle for anyone less than perfect. You are allowed to be picky. "Unwanted" children don't need to be told that they were an accident. They know.
Choose a Name. It is a travesty to invent a word that sounds nice, and use that as your child's identity. The meaning of a name is far more important that how it sounds, how often it is being used in your country at the time, etc. Take some time to consult good name dictionaries, including etymology, and before you make your final decision, be sure to check for other meanings in different languages. A name carries implicated identity.
Young Children
Empowerment. If I hadn't already used "the most crucial point", I would assign that title to this. Far more important than teaching your child what they should do, or should not do, is teaching them that they are capable of doing anything. Constantly reinforce that fact. Give your child a superiority complex! (If you get the other points right, this shouldn't have the common bad side effects of bullying, etc.) If you were bad at maths, or bad at music, or never learnt to drive, or couldn't hold a job, please, please don't project those things onto your child. I look forward to the day when I can say "Hold your head high boy. You're MY son." The balance is to get them accustomed to the idea that being the best will take time and effort. Also, that being the best is not about being BETTER than other people. It is only about you and the task. You should never push someone else down so that you can be "the best". That is a hollow victory.Love Languages. This is not just for your marriage, it also applies to your children. Each person identifies most strongly with one of these 5 "love languages": Touch, Words of Appreciation, Quality Time, Gifts, and Acts of Service. When your child is very young, be intentional about using all 5 languages to show them your love. As they grow older, be attentive to determine which one they most desire, and give to that. It is selfish to only give out of your love language. There is no point showering them with gifts, when all they want is quality time. Or telling them how great they are, when they just wish you would give them a hug.
Discipline. One simple, yet profound statement, should rule you. "Never discipline in anger." Forgiveness does not necessitate removal of consequence or restoration of trust, but forgiveness is essential and must be immediate. If you feel injured or upset, DO NOT SPEAK TO YOUR CHILD. Remove yourself immediately until you have dissolved all anger, and found forgiveness. Then return to carry out the correct consequence. Discipline is solely for the purpose of providing guidance. Not to appease your emotions. Under these guidelines, I believe physical punishment is acceptable. If you decide not to use physical punishment, then DO NOT threaten to use it. Be very careful with threats as EVERY promise of punishment must be fulfilled in order to retain respect and trust.
Mutual Respect and Trust underpins every deep relationship, and your parenting is no exception. If you take your two year-old to a dinner party and he makes so much noise that you feel embarrassed, you are not at liberty to discipline him. Just because you are inconvenienced by his actions, does not mean he is being naughty, he is simply being two. By considering his needs as equal in importance to your own, you build mutual respect. This foundation will be shiningly clear (or glaringly missing) when your child becomes a teenager. Closely related to Respect is Trust. You MUST become a man of your word. There is no such thing as a promise, your yes should mean yes and your no should mean no. Every simple thing you say is a contract and should only be broken when necessary with contrition and tact.
Exemplify Righteousness. This is possibly the hardest point of all, and the one that will be failed the most. Right-living is essential during parenthood. Even in the little things. Your child may not realise that you are cheating on your tax return, burning music and movies, or regularly breaking the speed limit, but subconsciously they will pickup on your deceptive ways and you will see it magnified in their lives.
Teach Learning. Schooling is a funny thing. Your child's grades are completely irrelevant. It is, however, essential that your child develops a love for learning. Teach them how to learn, and how to fall in love with a topic. Also teach them to take responsibility for their own learning. There is a big difference between learning and being taught. There are no boring subjects (except OHS) so if your child consistently reports that a certain subject is boring, then you can be sure they have a boring teacher (who either does not love the subject or does not love the kids). You will need to be creative and put some time and effort into helping them learn to love that subject again. If all else fails, consider a different teacher/school. Remember that each formative year is critical. If one stupid teacher wrecks english (or maths, history, etc.) for your child in primary school, they will struggle in that area for the rest of their lives.
Teenagers and Young Adults
Teach Skills. Please don't forget to teach your child how to ride a bike, how to drive, how to shave, how to tie a tie, how to apply for a job, etc. etc. All the countless little things that they really shouldn't have to teach themselves. This helps to give them an edge in life. Don't be lazy. Lead Them. Don't just read parenting books, read leadership books. The links between parenting and leadership is worthy of a book on it's own (perhaps I will write it one day). I recommend any books by John Maxwell. Everything that an employee is looking for in a leader, is also what a child wants to see in a parent. The key concepts of mutual respect and trust come into play here. Don't just raise your children, lead them. If you can get this concept, your children will obey and follow you because you inspire them, not just because they are dependant on you.
Analyse your Reaction. Popular Culture is changing quickly. Remember that you shocked your (old, fuddy-duddy) parents with your actions, so don't be surprised when your teenager does something shocking with their appearance, tastes, interests, etc. Before you react, analyse your reaction. How important is it? Consider swallowing your shock and displaying acceptance and tolerance for the sake of your relationship. Begin to prepare yourself now in the knowledge that the world of youth fads will be a shocking place once you are old.
Schedules and Priorities. A person with family, home, and regular job will naturally develop a schedule that suits them. 3 regular meals a day, standard bedtime, wake up early, etc. When your child is a young adult their priorities will be very different to yours. It would be highly counter-productive for them to adopt your schedule, so don't force it on them. They might have their most productive time from 6pm - 11pm, and regularly go to bed after midnight, but that is why Young Adults can get so much done. Appreciate it.
I'm sure there is more I can't think of right now that is probably very important to me. Perhaps I will update this post with more info. But now, I am tired and have work to do before bed. Goodnight.
Monday, July 12, 2010
Theology: A (Very) Brief Summary
My Blog has resigned itself to the fact that it must reside in the dungeon of neglect until, every few years, I dust it off and upload an assignment. This post is no exception. My assignment had strict guidelines. 100 words in response to each question. Due to stringent limits, my thoughts are necessarily brief.
1. Explain your views of the deity and humanity of Jesus Christ.
I believe that Jesus was fully human. Scripture clearly describes His bodily substance, genealogy, physical limitations, limited knowledge, emotions, public worship, temptation, and death. His humanity was confirmed many times by eye-witnesses (Acts 17:31, 1Pet 4:1)
I believe that Jesus was fully divine. Scripture evidences this by His own claims, miracles, virgin birth, resurrection, ascension, and the worship ascribed to Him by others. His deity was confirmed many times by eye-witnesses (John 20:28, 1 John 5:20)
Redemption lies between these two truths. His humanity allowed Him to be a substitute sacrifice. His divinity gave this act the power to redeem.
2. Outline your beliefs on the Godhead.
I believe in only one God, a spiritual being that created all other beings. I believe this one God has a plurality that defies all human metaphor. I believe that within this plurality exists three distinct persons, each with a different expression and role, but each in complete unity of being, of the same substance, and equal in dignity. The scriptures refer to these three persons as "Father" (Gal 1:1), "Son" (Heb 1:8) and "Spirit" (John 16:13). This understanding is essential to our daily christian walk as it forms a key part of our great commission (Matt 28:19).
3. Explain your views on the person and deity of the Holy Spirit.
I believe the Holy Spirit is not an impersonal force but a divine person (John 16:13), wholly God and member of the Holy Trinity. The Spirit was active in the creation and was the life breathed into the first human. The Spirit baptised (Luke 3:22), empowered and infilled Jesus during his earthly ministry, and was sent to all humanity upon its completion. The spirit indwells believers (1 Cor 3:16). The spirit speaks to our hearts, pointing to Christ, convicting of sin, giving knowledge, inspiring hope and assurance, sanctifying, and continually regenerating us, freeing our will to obey the Word.
4. How do you view the redemptive work of Christ and the salvation of man?
God has never revoked His gift of free will. The first man committed treason by honouring his own will above God. All of his descendants were enslaved to sin (Rom 5:12). God, in His mercy, redeemed humanity by paying the treason-debt (death and hell) with His own blood (Heb 9:12). This redemption is available as a free gift to every human throughout time, but must be appropriated through faith (Eph 2:8). From Eden to Calvary, believers accepted this gift through symbolic sacrifice of an animal. Now a physical act is not required, we accept through faith alone.
5. What is your position regarding the Bible (the Holy Scriptures of both the Old and New testaments)?
I accept the divine authority of written scripture as recorded in the Christian cannon. Throughout history God has revealed limited, comprehensible aspects of Himself to mankind. He inspired humans to write this revelation for dissemination, durability, purity and finality. Jesus quoted scripture and advocated it's divine inspiration (Mark 12:36). The apostles also quoted both OT and NT (1Tim 5:18). Not only does the Bible refer to itself as authoritative and inspired (2 Tim 3:16), but the Holy Spirit uses the scriptures to speak to us personally (Eph 5:26). Only God can be an adequate witness to Himself.
6. Explain water baptism.
Water Baptism replaces circumcision as a symbolic rite of initiation into union with Christ, indicating the burial of our sinful nature and our resurrection into newness of life (Rom 6:3-5). It is a public confession of faith, expression of commitment, and symbol of promise. A visible sign which points to an invisible grace. It has echoes in the story of Noah, Israel passing through the sea, and the death and resurrection of Christ. Jesus underwent baptism (Mark 1:9) and authorised His disciples to baptise others (John 3:22). Baptism is a crucial part of our great commission (Matt 28:19).
7. Outline your beliefs about the baptism with the Holy Spirit and Gifts of the Spirit.
I believe Holy Spirit baptism is a specific spiritual event, (with the scriptural analogy of immersion in fire - Luke 3:16) which results in a constant indwelling and consistent filling of the believer with the Spirit. The purpose of this indwelling is not sanctification, but empowerment for service (Acts 1:8), as manifested in various gifts of ministry. This event is a gift which cannot be deserved or earned and was observed at Pentecost where it bore the fruit of 3000 new believers. It is separate from the events of conversion and water baptism (Acts 8:16), although they may happen simultaneously.
8. Explain your views on divine healing.
I believe that all sickness is a perversion of creation and can be rectified by the Creator. Healing is a divine gift from God that cannot be earned or deserved, only appropriated by faith (Mat 8:13). The assistance of medicine does not invalidate the divine miracle, and should not be refused on grounds of "faith". Humans should engage in healing others under the unction of the Spirit, with the name and authority of Jesus. This was modelled (Luke 4:14,40) and even commanded (Mat 10:8) by Christ. Divine healing also stands as a sign to unbelievers. (Mat 15:31)
9. Explain your views on the Second Coming of Christ.
I believe that Christ, having ascended to heaven, will return in a sudden, obvious and glorious manifestation (Mat 24:30) that will mark the end of the age. The dead will rise and be judged with the living (2Tim 4:1). The church will be delivered from oppression and enter a perfect, endless life of unhindered intimacy with God and other believers, the final climax of God's redemptive work. This knowledge inspires believers to build His church with love and urgency, to watch (Mat 25:13) wait and hope, to petition Him to return, and to praise Him for His coming triumph.
10. What are your views on eternal judgement?
Every human will live only once, and face judgement in the afterlife (Heb 9:27). The justice of the Righteous Judge will be evident to all on that day (Rom 3:19). Every person will stand guilty of treason, regardless of good works, but those who have placed their faith in Christ will be redeemed and His righteousness credited to them (Rom 4:24). Those without justification will face the full force of God's just wrath. I believe 'forever' is an accurate though limited description of the afterlife's duration. Believers will also face a judgement which cannot result in damnation.
11. What is your position on “tongues as the initial evidence” of baptism with Holy Spirit?
I believe that glossolalia is the initial and most evident proof that baptism in the Spirit has taken place. The apostles accepted glossolalia as proof that gentiles could receive the Holy Spirit (Acts 10:46). This should not detract from the validity of other evidences of infilling including prophesy, powerful preaching (Acts 4:8), wisdom, courage and boldness (Acts 4:31). Glossolalia is a Spirit-inspired utterance directed toward God (Rom 8:26) and especially useful for private prayer, as it's purpose is to edify us. It should not be confused with other forms of "speaking in tongues" which are primarily for ministry.
12. Explain your beliefs on nature of Satan.
I believe in the existence of Satan (the adversary), created being, originator of sin and head of an angelic rebellion against God. Satan is an imitator (Isaiah 14:14), murderer, full of malice, father of lies and enemy of our souls, acting as both tempter and accuser (Rev 12:10), blinding people to the gospel. Christ resisted his temptations and we also are called to identify and resist him and his devices (James 4:7), understanding that the sacrifice of Christ has overcome and defeated him. In the end his schemes will fail and he will become the object of God's full wrath.
1. Explain your views of the deity and humanity of Jesus Christ.
I believe that Jesus was fully human. Scripture clearly describes His bodily substance, genealogy, physical limitations, limited knowledge, emotions, public worship, temptation, and death. His humanity was confirmed many times by eye-witnesses (Acts 17:31, 1Pet 4:1)
I believe that Jesus was fully divine. Scripture evidences this by His own claims, miracles, virgin birth, resurrection, ascension, and the worship ascribed to Him by others. His deity was confirmed many times by eye-witnesses (John 20:28, 1 John 5:20)
Redemption lies between these two truths. His humanity allowed Him to be a substitute sacrifice. His divinity gave this act the power to redeem.
2. Outline your beliefs on the Godhead.
I believe in only one God, a spiritual being that created all other beings. I believe this one God has a plurality that defies all human metaphor. I believe that within this plurality exists three distinct persons, each with a different expression and role, but each in complete unity of being, of the same substance, and equal in dignity. The scriptures refer to these three persons as "Father" (Gal 1:1), "Son" (Heb 1:8) and "Spirit" (John 16:13). This understanding is essential to our daily christian walk as it forms a key part of our great commission (Matt 28:19).
3. Explain your views on the person and deity of the Holy Spirit.
I believe the Holy Spirit is not an impersonal force but a divine person (John 16:13), wholly God and member of the Holy Trinity. The Spirit was active in the creation and was the life breathed into the first human. The Spirit baptised (Luke 3:22), empowered and infilled Jesus during his earthly ministry, and was sent to all humanity upon its completion. The spirit indwells believers (1 Cor 3:16). The spirit speaks to our hearts, pointing to Christ, convicting of sin, giving knowledge, inspiring hope and assurance, sanctifying, and continually regenerating us, freeing our will to obey the Word.
4. How do you view the redemptive work of Christ and the salvation of man?
God has never revoked His gift of free will. The first man committed treason by honouring his own will above God. All of his descendants were enslaved to sin (Rom 5:12). God, in His mercy, redeemed humanity by paying the treason-debt (death and hell) with His own blood (Heb 9:12). This redemption is available as a free gift to every human throughout time, but must be appropriated through faith (Eph 2:8). From Eden to Calvary, believers accepted this gift through symbolic sacrifice of an animal. Now a physical act is not required, we accept through faith alone.
5. What is your position regarding the Bible (the Holy Scriptures of both the Old and New testaments)?
I accept the divine authority of written scripture as recorded in the Christian cannon. Throughout history God has revealed limited, comprehensible aspects of Himself to mankind. He inspired humans to write this revelation for dissemination, durability, purity and finality. Jesus quoted scripture and advocated it's divine inspiration (Mark 12:36). The apostles also quoted both OT and NT (1Tim 5:18). Not only does the Bible refer to itself as authoritative and inspired (2 Tim 3:16), but the Holy Spirit uses the scriptures to speak to us personally (Eph 5:26). Only God can be an adequate witness to Himself.
6. Explain water baptism.
Water Baptism replaces circumcision as a symbolic rite of initiation into union with Christ, indicating the burial of our sinful nature and our resurrection into newness of life (Rom 6:3-5). It is a public confession of faith, expression of commitment, and symbol of promise. A visible sign which points to an invisible grace. It has echoes in the story of Noah, Israel passing through the sea, and the death and resurrection of Christ. Jesus underwent baptism (Mark 1:9) and authorised His disciples to baptise others (John 3:22). Baptism is a crucial part of our great commission (Matt 28:19).
7. Outline your beliefs about the baptism with the Holy Spirit and Gifts of the Spirit.
I believe Holy Spirit baptism is a specific spiritual event, (with the scriptural analogy of immersion in fire - Luke 3:16) which results in a constant indwelling and consistent filling of the believer with the Spirit. The purpose of this indwelling is not sanctification, but empowerment for service (Acts 1:8), as manifested in various gifts of ministry. This event is a gift which cannot be deserved or earned and was observed at Pentecost where it bore the fruit of 3000 new believers. It is separate from the events of conversion and water baptism (Acts 8:16), although they may happen simultaneously.
8. Explain your views on divine healing.
I believe that all sickness is a perversion of creation and can be rectified by the Creator. Healing is a divine gift from God that cannot be earned or deserved, only appropriated by faith (Mat 8:13). The assistance of medicine does not invalidate the divine miracle, and should not be refused on grounds of "faith". Humans should engage in healing others under the unction of the Spirit, with the name and authority of Jesus. This was modelled (Luke 4:14,40) and even commanded (Mat 10:8) by Christ. Divine healing also stands as a sign to unbelievers. (Mat 15:31)
9. Explain your views on the Second Coming of Christ.
I believe that Christ, having ascended to heaven, will return in a sudden, obvious and glorious manifestation (Mat 24:30) that will mark the end of the age. The dead will rise and be judged with the living (2Tim 4:1). The church will be delivered from oppression and enter a perfect, endless life of unhindered intimacy with God and other believers, the final climax of God's redemptive work. This knowledge inspires believers to build His church with love and urgency, to watch (Mat 25:13) wait and hope, to petition Him to return, and to praise Him for His coming triumph.
10. What are your views on eternal judgement?
Every human will live only once, and face judgement in the afterlife (Heb 9:27). The justice of the Righteous Judge will be evident to all on that day (Rom 3:19). Every person will stand guilty of treason, regardless of good works, but those who have placed their faith in Christ will be redeemed and His righteousness credited to them (Rom 4:24). Those without justification will face the full force of God's just wrath. I believe 'forever' is an accurate though limited description of the afterlife's duration. Believers will also face a judgement which cannot result in damnation.
11. What is your position on “tongues as the initial evidence” of baptism with Holy Spirit?
I believe that glossolalia is the initial and most evident proof that baptism in the Spirit has taken place. The apostles accepted glossolalia as proof that gentiles could receive the Holy Spirit (Acts 10:46). This should not detract from the validity of other evidences of infilling including prophesy, powerful preaching (Acts 4:8), wisdom, courage and boldness (Acts 4:31). Glossolalia is a Spirit-inspired utterance directed toward God (Rom 8:26) and especially useful for private prayer, as it's purpose is to edify us. It should not be confused with other forms of "speaking in tongues" which are primarily for ministry.
12. Explain your beliefs on nature of Satan.
I believe in the existence of Satan (the adversary), created being, originator of sin and head of an angelic rebellion against God. Satan is an imitator (Isaiah 14:14), murderer, full of malice, father of lies and enemy of our souls, acting as both tempter and accuser (Rev 12:10), blinding people to the gospel. Christ resisted his temptations and we also are called to identify and resist him and his devices (James 4:7), understanding that the sacrifice of Christ has overcome and defeated him. In the end his schemes will fail and he will become the object of God's full wrath.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)